8.6 References
- Staple, W.J., Comparison of Computed and Measured Moisture Redistribution Following Infiltration1. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1969. 33(6): p. 840-847.
- Rubin, J., Numerical Method for Analyzing Hysteresis-Affected, Post-Infiltration Redistribution of Soil Moisture1. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1967. 31(1): p. 13-20.
- Nolan, B.T., et al., Factors influencing ground-water recharge in the eastern United States. Journal of Hydrology, 2007. 332(1–2): p. 187-205.
- McPherson, R.A., et al., Statewide Monitoring of the Mesoscale Environment: A Technical Update on the Oklahoma Mesonet. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2007. 24(3): p. 301-321.
- Schaap, M.G., F.J. Leij, and M.T. van Genuchten, ROSETTA: a computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions. Journal of Hydrology, 2001. 251(3-4): p. 163-176.
- Hillel, D. and C.H.M. van Bavel, Simulation of Profile Water Storage as Related to Soil Hydraulic Properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1976. 40(6): p. 807-815.
- Hillel, D., Soil and Water: Physical Principles and Processes. . 1971, New York: Academic Press. 288.
- de Jong van Lier, Q. and O. Wendroth, Reexamination of the Field Capacity Concept in a Brazilian Oxisol. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2016. 80(2): p. 264-274.
- Ottoni Filho, T.B., et al., An Algebraic Pedotransfer Function to Calculate Standardized in situ Determined Field Capacity. 2016, 2016. 8(8).
- Assouline, S. and D. Or, The concept of field capacity revisited: Defining intrinsic static and dynamic criteria for soil internal drainage dynamics. Water Resources Research, 2014. 50(6): p. 4787-4802.
- Twarakavi, N.K.C., M. Sakai, and J. Šimůnek, An objective analysis of the dynamic nature of field capacity. Water Resources Research, 2009. 45(10).
- Jaynes, D.B. and D.E. James, The Extent of Farm Drainage in the United States. 2007, USDA Agricultural Research Service, National Soil Tilth Laboratory: Ames, Iowa.
