7 Interactive Courseware to Connect Discussion to Course Material: So What?
Speakers
Matt Smith, Tinne De Laet and Howard Scott
Chair
Sheila MacNeill
Abstract
Technologies continue to present educators with new means of interaction with their students, and COVID-19 has highlighted the imperative for these. Co-created Interactive Courseware (CIC) is a new academic platform under development which is intended to enable students’ close interaction with course material, potentially making courses more co-operative and dynamic, and their content co-constructed. Staff at four European Universities are working on this Erasmus+ project to explore these technologies in a range of pedagogical settings.
The Co-created Interactive Courseware facilitates interaction between students, their teacher and key texts in blended activities and conversations either face-to-face or remotely. Rather than the text remaining static on a page, the recorded annotations and memos create an asynchronous dialogue that emancipates users from being anchored to the printed page and the classroom.
We aim to discuss how this platform combines a social learning environment where students can help each other and track their progress, with a space to create interactive, co-creation-enabled textbooks with no technical overhead; one that incorporates a learning analytics engine offering lecturers insights into the learning trajectory of their students.
This will be a critically reflective account of progress on the development of the project so far, interrupted as it has been by the pandemic, and will include a section on how we see this contributing to online, blended and hybrid approaches to higher education.
This session will discuss the affordances we envisage this approach offers (collaboration, creativity, self-directed learning, personalised resources – see, e.g. Schuh, 2004; Sawyer, 2007; Singh, 2009) with the theoretical underpinnings we are drawing on (dialogic practice, heutagogy, student empowerment, nurturing agency in students – Hase & Kenyon, 2001; Gorsky et al., 2010) and demonstrate some hypothetical uses, including primary and post-compulsory teacher education and engineering.
We also seek feedback from audience members on their perceptions of whether and how this could be effectively implemented in their contexts/subjects as part of our research-based design to maximise its potential.
Gorsky, P., Caspi, A., Antonovsky, A., Blau, I. and Mansur, A. (2010). The Relationship between Academic Discipline and Dialogic Behavior in Open University Course Forums. Available at: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/820/1546 (Accessed 08.02.21)
Hase, S. and Kenyon, K. (2001). From andragogy to heutagogy. Available at: http://www.avetra.org.au/abstracts_and_papers_2001/Hase-Kenyon_full.pdf (Accessed 08.02.21)
Sawyer, R. K. (2007). Group Genius: The Creative Power of Collaboration. New York: Basic Books.
Schuh, K. (2004). Learner-centred principles in teacher-centred practices? Teaching and Teacher Education, 20:8, 833–846.
Singh, M. (2009). Collaborative Learning and Technology: Moving from Instructionism to Constructionism. Available at: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p14409_index.html (Accessed 08.02.21)
- co-construction
- collaboration
- pedagogy
- learners
- asynchronous